Understanding real food

Articles, research, and stories about farming, food systems, and the people growing our food.

This case study compared small farms that sell directly to customers (farm stands, farmers’ markets, etc.) with more traditional farms selling into big wholesale channels. Every $100 spent with the direct-marketing farms created $186 of total local economic activity, while the same $100 spent with conventional farms created $142. On top of that, local direct-marketing farms created about 29 local jobs per $1 million in sales, compared with only 10.5 jobs for the larger wholesale operations. Translation: buying from smaller local farms puts more money and more jobs into the surrounding community than buying from the big, anonymous supply chain.

Learn more

Washington State pulls together multiple studies on “farm-to-school” programs and reports a simple, striking number: every $1 invested in farm-to-school can generate up to $2.16 in local economic activity. That’s money going to farmers, truck drivers, packers, and main-street businesses instead of large, centralized food service companies. It’s a clear example of how public food dollars can be turned into a local economic engine instead of a pipeline to big national suppliers.

Learn more

This big review looks at 20 years of work on local food systems. It finds that local farms are particularly good at protecting farmland from sprawl, maintaining landscape diversity, and building climate resilience, even if transport emissions are only part of the story. For the environment, the big gains come from how local farms manage land, not just how far the food travels.

Learn more

This LCA compares 428 short and long food supply chains across six European countries. On average, long chains can be more eco-efficient per kg because of highly optimized logistics, but there’s huge variation: some short chains perform very well. The key takeaway: “local” isn’t magically greener; when short chains are well-organized (grouped deliveries, minimal waste, efficient storage) they can match or beat industrial chains on energy use and emissions.

Learn more

This paper shows how the expansion and intensification of agriculture over the last 50 years has driven massive biodiversity loss worldwide. High-input, monoculture systems are a major reason so many species are sliding toward extinction. When you choose food from lower-input, more local producers, you’re pushing against that trend.

Learn more

Working across European farms, this study shows that as agriculture becomes more intensive and uniform, both the number of species and the variety of “jobs” they perform in the ecosystem collapse. In practice, that means fewer pollinators, fewer natural pest-eaters, and more fragile ecosystems – the exact opposite of what you see on well-managed mixed farms.

Learn more

This review tracks fertilizer and manure from large-scale U.S. industrial farms into rivers, lakes, and the atmosphere. It shows how excess nitrogen and phosphorus from feedlots and vast corn/soy fields fuel toxic algal blooms, dead zones, and big chunks of our agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. In plain terms: concentrated factory farming is one of the main reasons so many lakes and coasts are turning green and lifeless.

Learn more

NRDC pulls together EPA and scientific data showing how large-scale industrial farms are major sources of water pollution, greenhouse gases, and soil degradation in the U.S. It highlights fertilizer runoff driving harmful algal blooms, manure lagoons leaking into groundwater, and air emissions from giant livestock operations. It’s a concise, accessible summary of why “Big Ag” is such a problem for land, air, and water.

Learn more

Across multiple large cohorts, people who ate more whole grains had lower risk of heart disease, total cancer, and dying from any cause. Swapping refined grains for whole-grain bread, oats, brown rice, etc. was consistently linked with longer, healthier lives.

Learn more

Looking at long-term eating patterns, this paper found that fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and nuts together were linked to lower cardiovascular mortality. It’s basically a data-driven endorsement of a plate built around simple, whole ingredients.

Learn more

Reviewing dozens of studies, this umbrella review links high intakes of free sugars (from soft drinks, desserts, etc.) with higher risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and dental problems. The big message: most people need to cut back on refined, added sugars and focus sweetness into small amounts of higher-quality sources like fruit and (in moderation) things like honey.

Learn more

Pooling 22 prospective studies, this meta-analysis showed that people in the highest ultra-processed food group had 17% higher risk of cardiovascular disease and 23% higher risk of coronary heart disease than those who ate the least. Sugary drinks and processed meats were especially bad, while some less-junk versions (like simple breads or yogurts) were less harmful.

Learn more

This massive review of 45 cohort studies found that higher ultra-processed food intake is consistently linked with higher risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, overweight/obesity, some cancers, and even common mental health disorders. The pattern is the same across countries: more factory food, more chronic disease.

Learn more

In more than 100,000 French adults, higher intake of ultra-processed foods was associated with higher risks of overall cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease. The key takeaway: eating more factory-made, packaged meals and snacks shows up later as more heart problems.

Learn more

Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit id pulvinar at morbi elit scelerisque nunc gravida donec dolor erat sit iaculis.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.